In modern societies, the responsibility for the actions to be simply that "the individual is often distributed separately from the consequences of their actions and do not feel personally responsible for them" (Trevino and Nelson, 2005, p. 181). There are several reasons why the responsibility lightly in modern organizations, including the fact that the management of opportunities, people say that is not their responsibility and take care of him because he is often "shared commondiluted with other groups of decisions in the organization hierarchy, or the psychological distance to potential victims who suffer the consequences of actions (p. 181), is.
Many organizations have faced in recent years, a reduction. Many examples can be used as an example of responsibility for negative actions can be deployed within an organization. For many years I was leading a team of international education for a large pharmaceutical company.Due to budgetary constraints, it was decided that my team will be reduced. Although our team was based in Europe and the Middle East, the organization's world headquarters in New York. It was noted that the WHO decision would be cut from the team was done with the participation of me, the main group leader training, human resources and managers in the region. I was the only person who knew these people personally. All otherknown from afar, as they were both in New York.
should be based on your supervisor, and because I lived in Europe and worked with them every day, I was asked to give my recommendations, we will go on performance and skills. I know a lot of thought to this decision would have justified the decision. I sent my recommendation to my editor in New York, on the basis of previous results active reviews, comments from the companypeople per day, and the level of commitment and performance showed. To my surprise, the final decision came two people to leave my post. In the end, I know that the decision of the group also contain information such as levels of wages, the cost of keeping people in some countries, etc. ..
The recommendations I made was ignored. In addition, the team decided that everyone should be informed by email. In addition,The best performance of my team, a turkish citizen living in Brussels a few months would have been repatriated to Turkey, then released. Soon I discovered that Turkey had no right to severance pay required, unlike the European Union, which requires an allowance of attention to each individual. When he protested the decision criteria, each individual in the team which took the decision as a team under the leadership of other groups in society. Personresponsibility for the decision to make because other team members have the responsibility and reporting procedures by other departments of large enterprises. Moreover, all political leaders of other persons affected, both physically and emotionally, on the eve of his decision, he felt no emotional bond with them.
The only explanation I have is that this decision is based on what was the best thing would be the highest percentage ofPeople. They thought that his decision to meet a consequentialist, saying the team was able to run more economically with people, the Turks to stay despite the fact that two of the best people were fired and no packages allowed to receive remuneration Members of the European team. Because of this decision has been taken as unfair and detrimental to the best people, me and some other team members left immediatelyCompany. vocational training and have not been able to recruit others in the constitution of society. Although no individual has assumed ultimate responsibility for the reason that the department has been devastating and lasting References:
Treviño, L., and Nelson, K. (2005). Social responsibility and business ethics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Friends Link : Sumsung Lcd Tv iPod Touch