It 'clear that the consequences of 11 September 2001, a blow to the very fabric of the parchment on which was written the Constitution. America was alarmed by the revelation that this new threat, not only threaten us abroad, but intended to put the plan of life and his regime in the country, on American soil. It 'was a new situation in the minds of Americans are satisfied after the defeat of the Soviet Union. Terrorism has never been considereddangerous because it has never been closer to 11.09 id. The Clinton administration has been attacked by many. Some criticisms are justified, in large part has been embellished.
Bill Clinton was facing a new enemy in the heart of the dividends of peace and truth has been caught with their pants down. To say that he had nothing to do in the years of attacks against unfair competition, but left plenty of opportunities to move, stop the swarm of invaders before the attacks, but I thinkIt 's safe to say that no president would have reacted differently over time Clinton. Terrorists still parasites change over time and was unable to mobilize the resources needed to accomplish what he did in the first year of the presidency of s, George W. Bush. The Clinton administration treated terrorism as criminal acts, not literal war. This is the approach in force, as had all his predecessors. We knew there were people who hatedUnited States, but had blinded his eyes to the fact that fanatical religious movements, and who wants to destroy the United States of America. Our false sense of security and also the feeling that our country was somehow immune to the deadly terror as a lullaby, which has shaken in a deadly sleep. President Bush was forced to the ground when the handle with the reality of the deadly threat of terrorism ourselves, to take the necessary steps for the timeand declare war on all those who wished us alas! It is hoped and believed that Bill Clinton had done the same.
Basically, President George W. Bush faces two options. One of them was nothing that was impossible to do, and they deserve a voice and a vote for his accusation. Obviously, this approach is preferable to liberals who would be hoping that they would not be attacked again satisfied. The other crucial election for President Bush, wasTake action and eliminate the terrorists wherever they live. This was clearly one of the objectives of the war in Iraq, a regime of supporting terrorism for decades. He brought the terrorists there to fight, so here at home instead of the face. Bush chose the second option because I was sure that what America was and what is right. Bush has taken effective measures to bin Laden and his fight against terrorism and the sources of research funding and dryup. Many of them were captured, killed or captured their leader. America was facing no new attack here, and many were frustrated by the new Department of Homeland Security. It is not just George W. Bush has a lot of credit for being a leader determined that it no longer matters of State receives the status quo has refused to do the behavior?
Just-President Bill Clinton has been unfairly criticized for not doing enough to prevent the emergence of an Osama binShop, in order to make President George W. Bush was wrong to do enough to wait and try to attack all the options before the invasion of Iraq. But when confronted by the United Nations, called on his help, but none in another way, how many resolutions useless and spineless. Bush also faces another difficult decision. I was going alone or going to renounce its policy in the hope that another terrorist attack happens. Bush did not! He built a coalition of over 40United Nations, which has been called "the coalition forces and the corrupt" by Senator John Kerry and presidential elections. There were no deaths in many countries in this war in Iraq, but most members of the volunteers of the coalition have decided to stay the course, or completed their seats and went to Iraq as a full partner in the war against terrorism. It 's easy to see that major world powers remain the head in the sand. Bush met with advisers who told him of the threat of terrorismin Iraq. He said that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. intelligence file has many nuclear weapons in Iraq. President Clinton saw the same intelligence and called for regime change, a policy by the Clinton administration and has been announced and supported by celebrities such as John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and Edward Kennedy of all people. When I saw George W. Bush, who did the only thing that seemed right. He chose to attack Iraq.
Now, moreWithin five years, have not found weapons of mass destruction. But it is clear that the regime of Saddam Hussein's Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Most attacks against Israel, Saddam Hussein had the fingerprints of everyone, including
$ 35,000.00 attention to families of suicide bombers. It 'is well known that Saddam sent his emissary to meet with some of the 9.11 terrorist, and is home to many terrorist groups as terrorists and found and killedNorthern Iraq during the war. What was the motivation? He just made his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. The following is an excerpt of Bush's speech at the Republican convention in New York:
"In Saddam Hussein, we saw a threat. Members of both parties, including my opponent and his running mate, saw the threat and voted to authorize the use of force. We went to the Security Council ' UN Uniteda unanimous resolution demanding the dictator disarm adopted, under pain of serious consequences. Leader in the Middle East urged him to participate. After more than a decade of diplomacy, we gave Saddam Hussein another chance, one last chance to fulfill their responsibilities in the civilian world. He refused again, and I had to decide which species is found only in the Oval Office, the decision does not ask the president, but be prepared to do. I have not forgotten the lessons of September 11the word of a madman, or take action to defend my country? Given the choice, I will defend America every time. "
Here, President Bush said that the point could not run the risk of Saddam. She decided to go on the offensive. If we decided that we sit on our hands and hope, more attacks to come, the U.S. has been attacked several times. But now, through the aggressive offensive of the United States in the war against terrorism ", a free Afghanistan is fighting terror, Pakistan isCapturing terrorist leaders, Saudi Arabia does not raid and arrests, Libya is dismantling its weapons programs, the army of a free Iraq will fight for freedom, and over three quarters of the most important Al-Qaeda and the employees were arrested or killed. "
Who can say that the United States and the world safer? If your argument is that in the Middle East, is still dangerous as ever, you're right. The Middle East will not be real peace. Arabs and Israelisare in perpetual conflict does not settle in the country. Muslim extremists hate America because they support Israel. Until we have good leadership in the U.S., we will continue to support Israel. Thanks to the intelligence of Bush, so that in future no other president ever restructured false reports. And never rape rooms, torture chambers, the children killed in a military dictator in Iraq, and parents fightingThe hands of the evil tyrant. The fact that no weapons of mass destruction, which means you only need to run from the fight? If we did what we fought so hard to be destroyed and America is now overrun by the barbarians at our gates, our nation would be much more of our collapse as a Roman finally infiltrate the face in defense of their empire invaders tired determined to destruction. The terrorists that the United States to be weak and vulnerable. I pray this does not happen.Under President Bush, will never happen. A President Kerry is a completely different scenario.
Democrats say they can not wage a war against terrorism better, but we can not say how. A week tell us that we are the war in Iraq and the next week, we are told that it was a mistake that had to do. Almost all the Democrats in Congress voted for the war in Iraq to do, but now we seem to be all about the war in Iraq is not ready to fund the troops. It 's time that the strikeWave of job, the argument against the war has changed. Now the number of troops at risk and is not promoted as a logical reason for the troops. But now, it was announced that the reason why President Bush should withdraw its troops because the Iraqi government is not enough problems for political change. It 'clear that the Democratic majority in Congress negotiate with the terrorists to leave the war we must fight. These anticssociety as we know.
Perhaps the greatest threat to our nation is not the war in Iraq at all. E 'is disturbing that while the U.S. lead the battle for the survival of our culture that we have a steady decline of morals, nor a president the power to change this situation. Bush senior federal judge to interpret the law is right and hopefully not rely on the banking legislation. immoral judges are one of the main reasons why the United States face a constantBelow from destruction. America is in the true sense, at war with itself and with the establishment of liberal, gay marriage, supporting abortion, euthanasia and the end of the war against terrorism. Are those ending what conservative Americans have shed their blood to defend! The people in the same position as the first settlers in the early days of America. King of England and its Parliament were the application of unjust laws and taxes on the colonists and settlersSick Of It. They looked at the Constitution and said he would not tolerate such treatment. As he struggled to free himself from the clutches of England, and at the same time, they discovered serious flaws in the Articles of Confederation. Parliament had too much power and the people driving in favor of the legislature. Therefore, the U.S. Constitution was born, people give America a voice. We support the right of wrong, unjust, immoral and depravedcitizens to express their opinion. However, we must defend our country against terrorists in the country and the terrorists of our moral society. E 'lethal as the others.
Tags : Sharp Aquos Lcdtvs iPod Touch
0 comments:
Post a Comment